Analysis

Analysis and Metaphysics: Essays in Honor of R. M. Chisholm by Richard Taylor (auth.), Keith Lehrer (eds.) PDF

Posted On March 16, 2018 at 1:27 pm by / Comments Off on Analysis and Metaphysics: Essays in Honor of R. M. Chisholm by Richard Taylor (auth.), Keith Lehrer (eds.) PDF

By Richard Taylor (auth.), Keith Lehrer (eds.)

ISBN-10: 9027711933

ISBN-13: 9789027711939

ISBN-10: 940109098X

ISBN-13: 9789401090988

Show description

Read or Download Analysis and Metaphysics: Essays in Honor of R. M. Chisholm PDF

Similar analysis books

Download e-book for iPad: Principles of Practical Tectonic Analysis of Cratonic by Henry V. Lyatsky, Gerald M. Friedman, Vadim B. Lyatsky

Steep crystalline-basement faults, quite often indicated by way of potential-field anomalies, performed a vital position in evolution of continental cratonic systems. within the Phanerozoic Western Canada Sedimentary Province, heritage of crustal block events and warps is reconstructed from the distribution of depocenters, lithofacies and buildings in structural-formational ?

Download PDF by Herbert S. Rosenkranz, Elena C. McCoy, Monica Anders,: Application of Short-Term Bioassays in the Fractionation and

Vi Williamsburg, Virginia, February 21-23, 1978. This symposium used to be backed via the U. S. Environmental safety business enterprise, place of work of strength Minerals and undefined, Washington, DC, and workplace of health and wellbeing and Ecological results, well-being results Re­ seek Laboratory, Biochemistry department, examine Triangle Park, NC.

Extra info for Analysis and Metaphysics: Essays in Honor of R. M. Chisholm

Example text

32 See P, p. 3. 33 See P, p. 149. 34 P, p. 144. 35 Ibid. 38 Ibid. 148. 38 P, pp. 148-149. 39 P, p. 126. 40 P, p. 137. 41 P, p. 90; and see also NEE, pp. 244-245. 42 TK, p. 96. 43 TK, p. 93. 44 See P, p. 126n. ', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 52 (1974), 22-38. 8 9 JAMES F. ROSS TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE* I Knowledge through what others tell us not only forms a large part of the body of our knowledge but also originates the patterns of appraisal according to which we add beliefs to our present store of knowledge.

It is not; for it is not a necessary condition for h's being evident to S that h be true, while it is a necessary condition for W's knowing h, that h be true. Hence, our account must allow that under suitable circumstances, something can become evident to me upon someone else's word, even though he does not know it to be so and even though it may in fact be false. One may not consider this consideration to be decisive because, while admitting that a false proposition may be evident to S, one could still insist that W's saying that h cannot make h evident to Sunless W knows that h.

But this relation need not encompass all the specific utterances of either; we discount much of what we hear as mere prelude, postlude or interlude for something else. However, restricting ourselves to definite propositions at a definite time, we can characterize the degrees of trust or confidence S may have in W in descending order, as follows: (a) S believes2 that W could not have been in error with respect to anything W claims. ) 9 (b) S believes2 that W knows with respect to anything W claims.

Download PDF sample

Analysis and Metaphysics: Essays in Honor of R. M. Chisholm by Richard Taylor (auth.), Keith Lehrer (eds.)


by Anthony
4.3

Rated 4.77 of 5 – based on 46 votes